What’s Required to Lead

“Power is a tumor that ends up killing its victim’s sympathies” – Henry Adams

“Power is a tumor that ends up killing its victim’s sympathies” (Jarvis, 2019, p. 56). This quote from historian Henry Adams sets the tone for Chapter 3 of Company of One, where Paul Jarvis explores what is required to lead effectively, and more importantly, how to do so without letting power erode your empathy and humanity. Leadership, when fueled by ego and unchecked ambition, can become toxic. But Jarvis offers a counterbalance: a collection of traits and strategies that allow leaders to inspire, guide, and support others without falling prey to the corrupting nature of power.

Jarvis identifies 19 leadership traits and skills commonly found in effective leaders: charisma, goal setting, confidence, persuasiveness, servant-mindedness, humility, motivation, clear communication, a diverse knowledge base and skill set, emotional intelligence, resilience, focus, decisiveness, agility, vigilance, relentlessness, self-awareness, empathy, and gratitude. What’s striking about this list is that most of these traits emphasize how a leader connects with others rather than how they control them. This is the opposite of power for power’s sake. Instead, these are qualities rooted in service, reflection, and purpose.

One of the most interesting insights in this chapter is Jarvis’s comparison of introverted and extroverted leaders. Contrary to the traditional image of bold, outgoing CEOs, Jarvis notes that quieter, calmer leaders often make the best listeners (p. 47). They are more likely to stay focused, hear out their team members, and are not afraid to roll up their sleeves and get to work (p. 47). This leadership style aligns well with the idea that effective leaders do not micromanage, they guide. They provide clarity and direction while allowing their teams the space to operate independently.

Personally, I picture this balance as a bowling lane with bumpers. The team has the autonomy to roll the ball and make decisions, take initiative, and solve problems, but the bumpers represent the boundaries a leader sets to keep efforts aligned with the organization’s larger goals. It is a way to ensure freedom within a defined framework. The leader’s role is to set those limits clearly, so the team does not stray too far off course, but they still has the room to work creatively and with ownership. Autonomy doesn’t mean chaos, it means trust, with structure.

This philosophy aligns with how I manage my team, time, and responsibilities. One of the most important lessons from this chapter is the necessity of setting boundaries (p. 56). Jarvis warns that without clear limits, leaders risk becoming overwhelmed and burned out, unable to focus on the work that matters most to them (p. 56). For me, saying “no” looks like time-blocking. I reserve every Tuesday and Thursday for deep work, which allows me to have focused, uninterrupted time to write, think, and create. All meetings, collaboration, and “customer” interactions happen on the remaining days. Without these boundaries, my calendar quickly spirals into a string of back-to-back meetings, leaving no room for strategic or proposal development work. Saying “no” to protect this space is not selfish, it’s essential.

If time-blocking is not a practical option for you, consider exploring other time management techniques in the article Mastering Your Schedule: Effective Time Management Strategies for Success published by the University of Pennsylvania (2024).

Leadership does not have to be loud, domineering, or power-hungry. In fact, the most effective leaders are those who remain grounded in humility, service, and clarity. By developing self-awareness, listening more than we speak, and setting healthy boundaries, we can avoid the trap Adams warns of. True leadership is not about gaining power, it’s about using whatever influence we have to make space for others, to empower them, and to remain fiercely aligned with our values. That is the kind of leader I aspire to be.

I would love to hear your thoughts:

  • Have you ever worked under a leader who embodied the “bumpers on a bowling lane” approach? How did that influence your performance?
  • What does “saying no” look like in your work or personal life? How do you maintain boundaries that protect your time and energy?

References

Jarvis, P. (2019). Company of One: Why staying small is the next big thing for business. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

University of Pennsylvania. (2024, May 9). Mastering your schedule: effective time management strategies for success. Retrieved from Penn LPS: https://lpsonline.sas.upenn.edu/features/mastering-your-schedule-effective-time-management-strategies-success

4 responses to “What’s Required to Lead”

  1. meaghan17j Avatar

    Great post this week, Samantha!

    As someone whose work doesn’t always allow for consistent time blocking, I’m really looking forward to trying out some of the other time management methods you mentioned. I’ve used the Pomodoro technique before and liked it, but I’ve found that it doesn’t always suit every type of task I’m working on.

    Jarvis’ take on introverted managers being “better” really resonated with me. I completely agree that qualities like listening, trusting the team, and stepping in when needed make for strong leadership. It made me curious, though—where would someone who’s more of an ambivert fall in that discussion? It also got me thinking about how leadership is still often portrayed in a way that goes against those values. In many workplaces, it seems like we still reward louder, more dominant traits over the quieter strengths Jarvis highlights. That said, I do think the definition of a great leader is evolving. We’re finally starting to see more leaders who are self-aware and intentional about how they show up—and I think that’s a really positive shift in the workforce.

    Like

    1. Samantha Ellithorpe Avatar

      Hi Meaghan,

      Thank you for your comment! I agree – there’s something powerful about the calm, intentional leadership style that often comes with introversion.

      Your question about where ambiverts fall in that discussion is a great one. I actually think ambiverts have a unique advantage because they can adapt depending on the situation. They can lean into listening and observation when needed, and also step up and take the lead more assertively when the moment calls for it. That kind of flexibility can make for a really balanced and effective leadership style, especially in fast-paced or evolving work environments.

      Regarding time management, I block off my calendar every Tuesday and Thursday for deep work. It has made a huge difference in my productivity and has helped me control my time and guard against interruptions. I even got a little sign for my office door that tells people whether I a available or in heads-down mode. This sign is simple but effective!

      We also use a Quad Chart to help prioritize our daily tasks, and it breaks down work into four categories:

      1. Important & Urgent (time-sensitive tasks)
      2. Important & Not Urgent (strategic planning)
      3. Urgent but Not Important (most phone calls and interruptions)
      4. Not Urgent & Not Important (busy work and trivial activities)

      This tool has been especially helpful when on-boarding new hires, as it teaches them how to distinguish between what is a priority and what can wait. It keeps everyone aligned and focused on the right work at the right time. I’ll be happy to share a copy if you are interested!

      Thank you again for engaging with the post!

      Like

  2. Jenny Griffin Avatar
    Jenny Griffin

    Samantha,

    Setting boundaries is something that some people may take offense to, but in reality, it is necessary for everyone to be able to work to their greatest potential.  It’s actually a great aspect of being a leader because if the leader shows they can set healthy boundaries, it will just trickle in amongst their co-workers who hopefully will learn to do the same. 

    I love your bowling alley with bumpers analogy.  To answer your question about ever having worked under a leader that works this way, I’d say my current supervisor does.  He is against micro-managing, and I appreciate that so much.  With him choosing this technique as part of his leadership style, he shows his staff that he trusts us to do our jobs as we should. That makes me trust him even more and it has amped up confidence in me over the years, that he has faith in me and my skill set. That greater confidence in myself, then in turn, allows me to trust myself more, which enhances my performance.  Knowing he has confidence in me, also brings about enthusiasm and the gusto to go for new adventures, propose new ideas, reach out to make new connections to form new partnerships with other organizations, etc.

    I enjoyed reading the article you recommended, and I am excited to try a couple of methods I have not before, especially the Pickle Jar Time Management Theory. I am definitely a visual learner and I look forward to investigating this technique a bit further and trying it out!

    One of my favorite parts of your reflection is mentioning us as leaders listening more than we speak and when you stated, “True leadership is not about gaining power, it’s about using whatever influence we have to make space for others, to empower them, and to remain fiercely aligned with our values.” Making space for others and empowering them really speaks to me, as that is what I feel I do as an educator. 

    Like

    1. Samantha Ellithorpe Avatar

      Hi Jenny,

      Thank you for your thoughtful comment! Your point really got me thinking about how nuanced leadership can be. The line between establishing healthy boundaries and slipping into micromanagement is definitely a tough one to walk. To keep with the bowling alley analogy, how wide do you set the bumpers? If they are too wide, you risk chaos and misalignment. Too narrow, and there’s no room for creativity or ownership.

      This is honestly the dance I find myself in often. The distance between the bumpers is not fixed, and it shifts based on the task, the timeline, and the person I am working with. Some of my team members thrive when given clear, tight directives as they appreciate the structure and predictability. Others feel more engaged and motivated when they are given the freedom to explore different ways to reach the end goal.

      Personally, I prefer to have clear direction and expectations, but I also value being able to adapt the process if I see a more efficient or effective path. That balance between clarity and flexibility is where I find the most fulfillment, and I try to extend that same mindset to those I work with.

      Like

Leave a comment